At a Glance: The Q·Score
NVIDIA scores 8.9 ("Very Bullish") against Micron's 8.2 ("Bullish") — a gap of 0.7 points. Both scores sit in the upper tier of the Q·Score range, so this is not a comparison between a strong stock and a weak one; it is a comparison between two high-performing technology companies where the differences are meaningful but nuanced. A gap of this size typically signals that one company holds a consistent structural edge across multiple dimensions rather than a single standout metric.
Quality — Profitability and Capital Efficiency
NVIDIA leads on Quality, and the numbers explain why clearly. Its net profit margin — the percentage of revenue that becomes profit after all costs — stands at 55.6%, meaning more than half of every dollar in revenue flows through to the bottom line. Micron's 41.5% margin is genuinely impressive for a semiconductor manufacturer, but it trails NVIDIA's by more than 14 percentage points. The return on equity (ROE) gap is even wider: NVIDIA's ROE of 101.5% — a measure of how efficiently a company generates profit from shareholders' capital — dwarfs Micron's already solid 39.8%. The data gives the edge to NVIDIA on Quality by a considerable margin.
Health — Balance Sheet and Execution
The data provided does not include debt/equity or current ratio figures for either company, so the Health dimension assessment leans on the execution metric available: EPS beat rate, which measures how consistently a company's reported earnings per share exceed analyst expectations. Both MU and NVDA post a 100% EPS beat rate, meaning every single quarterly earnings report in the measured period came in above consensus estimates. That is a rare and notable result for both companies simultaneously. On this dimension, the two are effectively tied on the execution metric available in the data, and neither shows a clear vulnerability.
Growth — Revenue, Earnings, and Surprise
This is the dimension where Micron's data is genuinely striking. Revenue growth of 196.3% and earnings growth of 756% are figures that reflect Micron's sharp recovery from a severe memory chip downturn — the company has moved from near-zero profitability back to substantial earnings in a compressed timeframe. NVIDIA's growth numbers — 73.2% revenue growth and 95.6% earnings growth — would lead almost any other comparison in the technology sector, yet here they sit in second place. The critical context is that Micron's figures are partly cyclical recovery, while NVIDIA's represent sustained expansion from an already large base. The data gives the edge to Micron on Growth by a wide margin on the raw numbers, though the nature of that growth differs significantly between the two companies.
Valuation — Price Relative to Fundamentals
Valuation is where the comparison produces its sharpest contrast. The forward P/E — the stock price divided by projected earnings per share over the next twelve months — is 7.3 for Micron and 19.1 for NVIDIA. In the semiconductor and broader technology sector, forward P/E ratios typically range from the mid-teens to the low thirties for established growth companies, making Micron's 7.3 unusually low and NVIDIA's 19.1 closer to the sector norm. The analyst consensus price target implies that Micron's current price of $746.81 is approximately 25.5% above the consensus target — meaning the stock is trading above where the analyst community collectively expects it to be. NVIDIA, at $215.20, sits roughly 25.1% below its consensus price target, suggesting analysts see room for the price to move toward that level. On the 52-week range position and implied upside/downside metrics, the data gives the edge to NVIDIA on Valuation.
Sentiment — Analyst Consensus
NVIDIA leads on Sentiment. With 95% of its 57 covering analysts holding a positive rating, NVIDIA commands one of the broader bases of analyst enthusiasm in the technology sector. Micron's 89% positive rating across 42 analysts is also a strong result — fewer than one in ten covering analysts holds a non-positive view — but it trails NVIDIA on both the ratio and the depth of coverage. The most notable divergence in this comparison is between Micron's Sentiment score and its Valuation picture: despite near-universal analyst positivity, the consensus price target sits below the current market price, suggesting that analyst enthusiasm has not translated into upward target revisions sufficient to justify where the stock currently trades. NVIDIA shows no such divergence — high sentiment aligns with a price target above the current level.
What the Data Shows
NVIDIA holds the higher Q·Score at 8.9 versus Micron's 8.2, with the gap driven primarily by NVIDIA's dominance on Quality — particularly its 55.6% profit margin and 101.5% return on equity — and its cleaner Valuation and Sentiment alignment. Micron leads decisively on Growth, posting revenue and earnings expansion rates that are exceptional even by semiconductor cycle standards, and the two companies are effectively matched on the execution component of Health. The closest dimension between them is Health, while Quality and Valuation show the widest separation in NVIDIA's favour.
Explore the Full Comparison
The live, interactive breakdown — updated in real time — is available at quantify.biz/compare/MU-vs-NVDA.