Apple Inc. vs Applied Materials, Inc. — Stock Comparison
Apple Inc. (AAPL) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) are both listed on US exchanges. This page compares their Q·Score ratings, key fundamentals (P/E, margins, growth), and Wall Street analyst consensus side by side. Data sourced from Yahoo Finance and updated on each page load.
Applied Materials, Inc. scores ahead of Apple Inc. on Q·Score (9.1 vs 7.7 out of 10), led by Valuation (9.1 vs 6) and Health (9.4 vs 7). Apple Inc. scores higher on Quality, reflecting stronger profitability and returns. Analyst consensus targets imply greater upside for AMAT (+30.2%) than for AAPL (+4.9%).
Price Performance
Normalised to 100 at period start — shows relative performance.
Q·Score Breakdown
High-quality business with 149% return on equity and 28% profit margins.
Earnings growing 43% year-over-year on 25% revenue growth.
Analyst Consensus
Fundamentals
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPL vs AMAT: which stock scores better overall?
Based on Q·Score, Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) scores 9.1/10 versus Apple Inc. (AAPL) at 7.7/10. The Q·Score measures five dimensions: Quality, Health, Growth, Valuation, and Sentiment. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.
Which has better revenue growth: AAPL or AMAT?
Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) scores higher on Growth (9.5/10 vs 8.8/10). Apple Inc. reports revenue growth (16.4% YoY) while Applied Materials, Inc. reports (24.8% YoY). Growth scores reflect revenue and earnings momentum relative to sector peers.
Is AAPL or AMAT more attractively valued?
Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) scores higher on Valuation (9.1/10 vs 6/10). AAPL trades at 32.4× P/E versus AMAT at 26.8×. Valuation is assessed using P/E ratio, analyst price targets, and 52-week range positioning relative to sector peers.
What do analysts say about AAPL vs AMAT?
There are 39 analysts covering AAPL with a consensus price target of $324.45, and 35 analysts covering AMAT with a consensus target of $641.03. Analyst consensus ratings are aggregated from Wall Street research and do not constitute investment advice.
Which is more profitable: AAPL or AMAT?
Apple Inc. (AAPL) scores higher on Quality (9.3/10 vs 9/10). Net profit margin: AAPL at 27.6%, AMAT at 30.1%. Quality scores reflect profit margins, return on equity, and free cash flow generation.
Which has stronger financial health: AAPL or AMAT?
Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) scores higher on Financial Health (9.4/10 vs 7/10). Market beta: AAPL at 1.09, AMAT at 1.62. Health scores consider beta, debt-to-equity, and current ratio. All investments carry risk — this is not investment advice.
What are the market caps of AAPL and AMAT?
Apple Inc. (AAPL) has a market capitalisation of $4.51T, while Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a market cap of $390.9B. Market cap data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and reflects the most recent available figures.
Do AAPL or AMAT pay dividends?
AAPL pays a dividend yield of 0.35%, while AMAT pays a dividend yield of 0.43%. Dividend yields fluctuate with share price and company payout decisions.
Related Comparisons
Q·Score is an educational tool and is not financial advice. Data provided by Yahoo Finance. Updated on each page load. How it's calculated →