Applied Materials, Inc. vs KLA Corporation — Stock Comparison

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and KLA Corporation (KLAC) are both listed on US exchanges. This page compares their Q·Score ratings, key fundamentals (P/E, margins, growth), and Wall Street analyst consensus side by side. Data sourced from Yahoo Finance and updated on each page load.

Q·Score Winner
Applied Materials, Inc.
AMAT8.4/10vs 7.3/10

Applied Materials, Inc. scores ahead of KLA Corporation on Q·Score (8.4 vs 7.3 out of 10), led by Growth (7.9 vs 6.1) and Valuation (7.5 vs 5.8). Analyst consensus targets imply greater upside for AMAT (+17.9%) than for KLAC (-1.8%).

Q·Score Breakdown

8.4
Bullish
Overall
7.3
Bullish
9
Quality
9
9.4
Health
8.2
7.9
Growth
6.1
7.5
Valuation
5.8
8
Sentiment
6.9
AMAT

Clean balance sheet with low leverage (0.3× debt-to-equity).

KLAC

High-quality business with 95% return on equity and 36% profit margins.

Analyst Consensus

Bullish
+17.9%
Target $509.63
35 analysts
Bullish
-1.8%
Target $1855.14
29 analysts

Fundamentals

AMAT
KLAC
40.7×
Trailing P/E
53.5×
26.8×
Forward P/E
37.9×
29.31%
Profit Margin
35.66%
48.96%
Gross Margin
61.45%
39.69%
ROE
94.98%
11.40%
Revenue Growth
11.50%
33.50%
Earnings Growth
11.80%
1.65
Beta
1.50
0.49%
Dividend Yield
0.49%
$343.1B
Market Cap
$246.7B
52-Week Range
AMAT
$15394% of range$448
KLAC
$74096% of range$1,939

Frequently Asked Questions

AMAT vs KLAC: which stock scores better overall?

Based on Q·Score, Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) scores 8.4/10 versus KLA Corporation (KLAC) at 7.3/10. The Q·Score measures five dimensions: Quality, Health, Growth, Valuation, and Sentiment. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.

Which has better revenue growth: AMAT or KLAC?

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) scores higher on Growth (7.9/10 vs 6.1/10). Applied Materials, Inc. reports revenue growth (11.4% YoY) while KLA Corporation reports (11.5% YoY). Growth scores reflect revenue and earnings momentum relative to sector peers.

Is AMAT or KLAC more attractively valued?

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) scores higher on Valuation (7.5/10 vs 5.8/10). AMAT trades at 26.8× P/E versus KLAC at 37.9×. Valuation is assessed using P/E ratio, analyst price targets, and 52-week range positioning relative to sector peers.

What do analysts say about AMAT vs KLAC?

There are 35 analysts covering AMAT with a consensus price target of $509.63, and 29 analysts covering KLAC with a consensus target of $1855.14. Analyst consensus ratings are aggregated from Wall Street research and do not constitute investment advice.

Which is more profitable: AMAT or KLAC?

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) scores higher on Quality (9/10 vs 9/10). Net profit margin: AMAT at 29.3%, KLAC at 35.7%. Quality scores reflect profit margins, return on equity, and free cash flow generation.

Which has stronger financial health: AMAT or KLAC?

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) scores higher on Financial Health (9.4/10 vs 8.2/10). Market beta: AMAT at 1.65, KLAC at 1.50. Health scores consider beta, debt-to-equity, and current ratio. All investments carry risk — this is not investment advice.

What are the market caps of AMAT and KLAC?

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a market capitalisation of $343.1B, while KLA Corporation (KLAC) has a market cap of $246.7B. Market cap data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and reflects the most recent available figures.

Do AMAT or KLAC pay dividends?

AMAT pays a dividend yield of 0.49%, while KLAC pays a dividend yield of 0.49%. Dividend yields fluctuate with share price and company payout decisions.

Related Comparisons

Q·Score is an educational tool and is not financial advice. Data provided by Yahoo Finance. Updated on each page load. How it's calculated →

Data provided by Yahoo Finance ·  Updated on each page load ·  For informational purposes only · Not financial advice · Quantify.biz © 2026