Cadence Design Systems, Inc. vs Microsoft Corporation — Stock Comparison
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) are both listed on US exchanges. This page compares their Q·Score ratings, key fundamentals (P/E, margins, growth), and Wall Street analyst consensus side by side. Data sourced from Yahoo Finance and updated on each page load.
Microsoft Corporation scores ahead of Cadence Design Systems, Inc. on Q·Score (8.6 vs 7.6 out of 10), led by Valuation (8.6 vs 5.8) and Quality (9 vs 7.4). Analyst consensus targets imply greater upside for MSFT (+48.0%) than for CDNS (-0.5%).
Price Performance
Normalised to 100 at period start — shows relative performance.
Q·Score Breakdown
Clean balance sheet with low leverage (0.5× debt-to-equity).
High-quality business with 34% return on equity and 39% profit margins.
Analyst Consensus
Fundamentals
Frequently Asked Questions
CDNS vs MSFT: which stock scores better overall?
Based on Q·Score, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) scores 8.6/10 versus Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 7.6/10. The Q·Score measures five dimensions: Quality, Health, Growth, Valuation, and Sentiment. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.
Which has better revenue growth: CDNS or MSFT?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) scores higher on Growth (8/10 vs 7.9/10). Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reports revenue growth (18.7% YoY) while Microsoft Corporation reports (18.3% YoY). Growth scores reflect revenue and earnings momentum relative to sector peers.
Is CDNS or MSFT more attractively valued?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) scores higher on Valuation (8.6/10 vs 5.8/10). CDNS trades at 41.3× P/E versus MSFT at 19.6×. Valuation is assessed using P/E ratio, analyst price targets, and 52-week range positioning relative to sector peers.
What do analysts say about CDNS vs MSFT?
There are 26 analysts covering CDNS with a consensus price target of $385.37, and 55 analysts covering MSFT with a consensus target of $561.39. Analyst consensus ratings are aggregated from Wall Street research and do not constitute investment advice.
Which is more profitable: CDNS or MSFT?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) scores higher on Quality (9/10 vs 7.4/10). Net profit margin: CDNS at 21.2%, MSFT at 39.3%. Quality scores reflect profit margins, return on equity, and free cash flow generation.
Which has stronger financial health: CDNS or MSFT?
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) scores higher on Financial Health (8.5/10 vs 8.5/10). Market beta: CDNS at 1.15, MSFT at 1.10. Health scores consider beta, debt-to-equity, and current ratio. All investments carry risk — this is not investment advice.
What are the market caps of CDNS and MSFT?
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) has a market capitalisation of $106.8B, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a market cap of $2.82T. Market cap data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and reflects the most recent available figures.
Do CDNS or MSFT pay dividends?
CDNS does not currently pay a dividend, while MSFT pays a dividend yield of 0.92%. Dividend yields fluctuate with share price and company payout decisions.
Related Comparisons
Q·Score is an educational tool and is not financial advice. Data provided by Yahoo Finance. Updated on each page load. How it's calculated →