Quantify

ConocoPhillips vs Geopark Ltd — Stock Comparison

ConocoPhillips (COP) and Geopark Ltd (GPRK) are both listed on US exchanges. This page compares their Q·Score ratings, key fundamentals (P/E, margins, growth), and Wall Street analyst consensus side by side. Data sourced from Yahoo Finance and updated on each page load.

vs
Q·Score Winner
ConocoPhillips
COP7/10vs 6.4/10

ConocoPhillips narrowly edges Geopark Ltd on Q·Score (7 vs 6.4 out of 10), led by Health (8 vs 4.2) and Valuation (9.1 vs 6.2). Geopark Ltd scores higher on Growth, reflecting stronger revenue and earnings momentum. Analyst consensus targets imply greater upside for COP (+32.5%) than for GPRK (+3.3%).

Price Performance

Normalised to 100 at period start — shows relative performance.

Loading…
● COP● GPRK

Q·Score Breakdown

7
Bullish
Overall
6.4
Neutral
7.7
Quality
9.2
8
Health
4.2
2.8
Growth
5.7
9.1
Valuation
6.2
7.2
Sentiment
5.9
COP

Consensus analyst target of $142.77 is 33% above current price.

⚠ revenue declining 5% year-over-year.

GPRK

High-quality business with 23% return on equity and 12% profit margins.

⚠ balance sheet warrants attention.

Analyst Consensus

Bullish
+32.5%
Target $142.77
26 analysts
Bullish
+3.3%
Target $10.47
4 analysts

Fundamentals

COP
GPRK
18.3×
Trailing P/E
9.6×
11.7×
Forward P/E
3.9×
12.33%
Profit Margin
11.74%
45.59%
Gross Margin
72.02%
11.28%
ROE
22.57%
-5.30%
Revenue Growth
-6.50%
-20.20%
Earnings Growth
44.00%
0.11
Beta
0.36
3.02%
Dividend Yield
0.89%
$131.3B
Market Cap
$656M
52-Week Range
COP
$8644% of range$136
GPRK
$672% of range$12

Frequently Asked Questions

COP vs GPRK: which stock scores better overall?

Based on Q·Score, ConocoPhillips (COP) scores 7/10 versus Geopark Ltd (GPRK) at 6.4/10. The Q·Score measures five dimensions: Quality, Health, Growth, Valuation, and Sentiment. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.

Which has better revenue growth: COP or GPRK?

Geopark Ltd (GPRK) scores higher on Growth (5.7/10 vs 2.8/10). ConocoPhillips reports revenue growth (-5.3% YoY) while Geopark Ltd reports (-6.5% YoY). Growth scores reflect revenue and earnings momentum relative to sector peers.

Is COP or GPRK more attractively valued?

ConocoPhillips (COP) scores higher on Valuation (9.1/10 vs 6.2/10). COP trades at 11.7× P/E versus GPRK at 3.9×. Valuation is assessed using P/E ratio, analyst price targets, and 52-week range positioning relative to sector peers.

What do analysts say about COP vs GPRK?

There are 26 analysts covering COP with a consensus price target of $142.77, and 4 analysts covering GPRK with a consensus target of $10.47. Analyst consensus ratings are aggregated from Wall Street research and do not constitute investment advice.

Which is more profitable: COP or GPRK?

Geopark Ltd (GPRK) scores higher on Quality (9.2/10 vs 7.7/10). Net profit margin: COP at 12.3%, GPRK at 11.7%. Quality scores reflect profit margins, return on equity, and free cash flow generation.

Which has stronger financial health: COP or GPRK?

ConocoPhillips (COP) scores higher on Financial Health (8/10 vs 4.2/10). Market beta: COP at 0.11, GPRK at 0.36. Health scores consider beta, debt-to-equity, and current ratio. All investments carry risk — this is not investment advice.

What are the market caps of COP and GPRK?

ConocoPhillips (COP) has a market capitalisation of $131.3B, while Geopark Ltd (GPRK) has a market cap of $656M. Market cap data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and reflects the most recent available figures.

Do COP or GPRK pay dividends?

COP pays a dividend yield of 3.02%, while GPRK pays a dividend yield of 0.89%. Dividend yields fluctuate with share price and company payout decisions.

Related Comparisons

COP vs XOMCOP vs CVXCOP vs DVNCOP vs EOGCOP vs LNG

Q·Score is an educational tool and is not financial advice. Data provided by Yahoo Finance. Updated on each page load. How it's calculated →

Data provided by Yahoo Finance ·  Updated on each page load ·  For informational purposes only · Not financial advice · Quantify.biz © 2026