ConocoPhillips vs Marathon Petroleum Corporation — Stock Comparison

ConocoPhillips (COP) and Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) are both listed on US exchanges. This page compares their Q·Score ratings, key fundamentals (P/E, margins, growth), and Wall Street analyst consensus side by side. Data sourced from Yahoo Finance and updated on each page load.

Q·Score Winner
ConocoPhillips
COP7/10vs 7/10

ConocoPhillips and Marathon Petroleum Corporation are evenly matched on Q·Score (7/10 each). Marathon Petroleum Corporation scores higher on Growth, reflecting stronger revenue and earnings momentum. Analyst consensus targets imply greater upside for COP (+32.5%) than for MPC (+10.4%).

Price Performance

Normalised to 100 at period start — shows relative performance.

Loading…
COPMPC

Q·Score Breakdown

7
Bullish
Overall
7
Bullish
7.7
Quality
7.5
8
Health
6.5
2.8
Growth
7.3
9.1
Valuation
7.3
7.2
Sentiment
5.9
COP

Consensus analyst target of $142.77 is 33% above current price.

revenue declining 5% year-over-year.

MPC

High-quality business with 27% return on equity.

Analyst Consensus

Bullish
+32.5%
Target $142.77
26 analysts
Neutral
+10.4%
Target $268.17
18 analysts

Fundamentals

COP
MPC
18.3×
Trailing P/E
16.0×
11.7×
Forward P/E
10.0×
12.33%
Profit Margin
3.41%
45.59%
Gross Margin
10.74%
11.28%
ROE
27.46%
-5.30%
Revenue Growth
8.80%
-20.20%
Earnings Growth
0.11
Beta
0.52
3.02%
Dividend Yield
$131.3B
Market Cap
$70.9B
52-Week Range
COP
$8644% of range$136
MPC
$15874% of range$272

Frequently Asked Questions

COP vs MPC: which stock scores better overall?

Based on Q·Score, ConocoPhillips (COP) scores 7/10 versus Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) at 7/10. The Q·Score measures five dimensions: Quality, Health, Growth, Valuation, and Sentiment. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.

Which has better revenue growth: COP or MPC?

Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) scores higher on Growth (7.3/10 vs 2.8/10). ConocoPhillips reports revenue growth (-5.3% YoY) while Marathon Petroleum Corporation reports (8.8% YoY). Growth scores reflect revenue and earnings momentum relative to sector peers.

Is COP or MPC more attractively valued?

ConocoPhillips (COP) scores higher on Valuation (9.1/10 vs 7.3/10). COP trades at 11.7× P/E versus MPC at 10.0×. Valuation is assessed using P/E ratio, analyst price targets, and 52-week range positioning relative to sector peers.

What do analysts say about COP vs MPC?

There are 26 analysts covering COP with a consensus price target of $142.77, and 18 analysts covering MPC with a consensus target of $268.17. Analyst consensus ratings are aggregated from Wall Street research and do not constitute investment advice.

Which is more profitable: COP or MPC?

ConocoPhillips (COP) scores higher on Quality (7.7/10 vs 7.5/10). Net profit margin: COP at 12.3%, MPC at 3.4%. Quality scores reflect profit margins, return on equity, and free cash flow generation.

Which has stronger financial health: COP or MPC?

ConocoPhillips (COP) scores higher on Financial Health (8/10 vs 6.5/10). Market beta: COP at 0.11, MPC at 0.52. Health scores consider beta, debt-to-equity, and current ratio. All investments carry risk — this is not investment advice.

What are the market caps of COP and MPC?

ConocoPhillips (COP) has a market capitalisation of $131.3B, while Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) has a market cap of $70.9B. Market cap data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and reflects the most recent available figures.

Do COP or MPC pay dividends?

COP pays a dividend yield of 3.02%, while MPC does not currently pay a dividend. Dividend yields fluctuate with share price and company payout decisions.

Q·Score is an educational tool and is not financial advice. Data provided by Yahoo Finance. Updated on each page load. How it's calculated →

Data provided by Yahoo Finance ·  Updated on each page load ·  For informational purposes only · Not financial advice · Quantify.biz © 2026