ConocoPhillips vs Targa Resources, Inc. — Stock Comparison

ConocoPhillips (COP) and Targa Resources, Inc. (TRGP) are both listed on US exchanges. This page compares their Q·Score ratings, key fundamentals (P/E, margins, growth), and Wall Street analyst consensus side by side. Data sourced from Yahoo Finance and updated on each page load.

Q·Score Winner
ConocoPhillips
COP7/10vs 6.2/10

ConocoPhillips scores ahead of Targa Resources, Inc. on Q·Score (7 vs 6.2 out of 10), led by Health (8 vs 3.3) and Valuation (9.1 vs 5.4). Targa Resources, Inc. scores higher on Growth, reflecting stronger revenue and earnings momentum. Analyst consensus targets imply greater upside for COP (+32.5%) than for TRGP (+10.3%).

Price Performance

Normalised to 100 at period start — shows relative performance.

Loading…
COPTRGP

Q·Score Breakdown

7
Bullish
Overall
6.2
Neutral
7.7
Quality
7.8
8
Health
3.3
2.8
Growth
6.4
9.1
Valuation
5.4
7.2
Sentiment
8.4
COP

Consensus analyst target of $142.77 is 33% above current price.

revenue declining 5% year-over-year.

TRGP

87% of 23 covering analysts have a positive rating.

high leverage at 5.9× debt-to-equity.

Analyst Consensus

Bullish
+32.5%
Target $142.77
26 analysts
Bullish
+10.3%
Target $285.33
21 analysts

Fundamentals

COP
TRGP
18.3×
Trailing P/E
26.4×
11.7×
Forward P/E
21.0×
12.33%
Profit Margin
12.87%
45.59%
Gross Margin
41.77%
11.28%
ROE
74.10%
-5.30%
Revenue Growth
-10.20%
-20.20%
Earnings Growth
142.90%
0.11
Beta
0.71
3.12%
Dividend Yield
1.64%
$131.3B
Market Cap
$55.5B
52-Week Range
COP
$8644% of range$136
TRGP
$14484% of range$280

Frequently Asked Questions

COP vs TRGP: which stock scores better overall?

Based on Q·Score, ConocoPhillips (COP) scores 7/10 versus Targa Resources, Inc. (TRGP) at 6.2/10. The Q·Score measures five dimensions: Quality, Health, Growth, Valuation, and Sentiment. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.

Which has better revenue growth: COP or TRGP?

Targa Resources, Inc. (TRGP) scores higher on Growth (6.4/10 vs 2.8/10). ConocoPhillips reports revenue growth (-5.3% YoY) while Targa Resources, Inc. reports (-10.2% YoY). Growth scores reflect revenue and earnings momentum relative to sector peers.

Is COP or TRGP more attractively valued?

ConocoPhillips (COP) scores higher on Valuation (9.1/10 vs 5.4/10). COP trades at 11.7× P/E versus TRGP at 21.0×. Valuation is assessed using P/E ratio, analyst price targets, and 52-week range positioning relative to sector peers.

What do analysts say about COP vs TRGP?

There are 26 analysts covering COP with a consensus price target of $142.77, and 21 analysts covering TRGP with a consensus target of $285.33. Analyst consensus ratings are aggregated from Wall Street research and do not constitute investment advice.

Which is more profitable: COP or TRGP?

Targa Resources, Inc. (TRGP) scores higher on Quality (7.8/10 vs 7.7/10). Net profit margin: COP at 12.3%, TRGP at 12.9%. Quality scores reflect profit margins, return on equity, and free cash flow generation.

Which has stronger financial health: COP or TRGP?

ConocoPhillips (COP) scores higher on Financial Health (8/10 vs 3.3/10). Market beta: COP at 0.11, TRGP at 0.71. Health scores consider beta, debt-to-equity, and current ratio. All investments carry risk — this is not investment advice.

What are the market caps of COP and TRGP?

ConocoPhillips (COP) has a market capitalisation of $131.3B, while Targa Resources, Inc. (TRGP) has a market cap of $55.5B. Market cap data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and reflects the most recent available figures.

Do COP or TRGP pay dividends?

COP pays a dividend yield of 3.12%, while TRGP pays a dividend yield of 1.64%. Dividend yields fluctuate with share price and company payout decisions.

Q·Score is an educational tool and is not financial advice. Data provided by Yahoo Finance. Updated on each page load. How it's calculated →

Data provided by Yahoo Finance ·  Updated on each page load ·  For informational purposes only · Not financial advice · Quantify.biz © 2026