Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) vs MetLife, Inc. — Stock Comparison
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) (GS) and MetLife, Inc. (MET) are both listed on US exchanges. This page compares their Q·Score ratings, key fundamentals (P/E, margins, growth), and Wall Street analyst consensus side by side. Data sourced from Yahoo Finance and updated on each page load.
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) narrowly edges MetLife, Inc. on Q·Score (6.6 vs 6.5 out of 10), led by Growth (9.6 vs 7.4) and Quality (7.4 vs 6.6). MetLife, Inc. scores higher on Sentiment, reflecting stronger analyst and market sentiment. Analyst consensus targets imply greater upside for MET (+7.5%) than for GS (-13.2%).
Price Performance
Normalised to 100 at period start — shows relative performance.
Q·Score Breakdown
Earnings growing 24% year-over-year on 14% revenue growth.
⚠ cautious analyst consensus — few Buy ratings.
Earnings growing 36% year-over-year.
Analyst Consensus
Fundamentals
Frequently Asked Questions
GS vs MET: which stock scores better overall?
Based on Q·Score, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) (GS) scores 6.6/10 versus MetLife, Inc. (MET) at 6.5/10. The Q·Score measures five dimensions: Quality, Health, Growth, Valuation, and Sentiment. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.
Which has better revenue growth: GS or MET?
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) (GS) scores higher on Growth (9.6/10 vs 7.4/10). Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) reports revenue growth (14.5% YoY) while MetLife, Inc. reports (2.7% YoY). Growth scores reflect revenue and earnings momentum relative to sector peers.
Is GS or MET more attractively valued?
MetLife, Inc. (MET) scores higher on Valuation (6.4/10 vs 4.8/10). GS trades at 16.7× P/E versus MET at 7.8×. Valuation is assessed using P/E ratio, analyst price targets, and 52-week range positioning relative to sector peers.
What do analysts say about GS vs MET?
There are 20 analysts covering GS with a consensus price target of $951.30, and 16 analysts covering MET with a consensus target of $92.00. Analyst consensus ratings are aggregated from Wall Street research and do not constitute investment advice.
Which is more profitable: GS or MET?
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) (GS) scores higher on Quality (7.4/10 vs 6.6/10). Net profit margin: GS at 29.4%, MET at 4.7%. Quality scores reflect profit margins, return on equity, and free cash flow generation.
Which has stronger financial health: GS or MET?
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) (GS) scores higher on Financial Health (6/10 vs 5.5/10). Market beta: GS at 1.29, MET at 0.78. Health scores consider beta, debt-to-equity, and current ratio. All investments carry risk — this is not investment advice.
What are the market caps of GS and MET?
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) (GS) has a market capitalisation of $323.5B, while MetLife, Inc. (MET) has a market cap of $55.1B. Market cap data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and reflects the most recent available figures.
Do GS or MET pay dividends?
GS pays a dividend yield of 1.65%, while MET pays a dividend yield of 2.71%. Dividend yields fluctuate with share price and company payout decisions.
Related Comparisons
Q·Score is an educational tool and is not financial advice. Data provided by Yahoo Finance. Updated on each page load. How it's calculated →