Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) vs Regions Financial Corporation — Stock Comparison
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) (GS) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF) are both listed on US exchanges. This page compares their Q·Score ratings, key fundamentals (P/E, margins, growth), and Wall Street analyst consensus side by side. Data sourced from Yahoo Finance and updated on each page load.
Regions Financial Corporation narrowly edges Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) on Q·Score (6.8 vs 6.6 out of 10), led by Valuation (7.3 vs 4.8) and Sentiment (5.1 vs 4.7). Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) scores higher on Growth, reflecting stronger revenue and earnings momentum. Analyst consensus targets imply greater upside for RF (+7.4%) than for GS (-13.2%).
Price Performance
Normalised to 100 at period start — shows relative performance.
Q·Score Breakdown
Earnings growing 24% year-over-year on 14% revenue growth.
⚠ cautious analyst consensus — few Buy ratings.
Earnings growing 22% year-over-year.
⚠ analyst sentiment is cautious.
Analyst Consensus
Fundamentals
Frequently Asked Questions
GS vs RF: which stock scores better overall?
Based on Q·Score, Regions Financial Corporation (RF) scores 6.8/10 versus Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) (GS) at 6.6/10. The Q·Score measures five dimensions: Quality, Health, Growth, Valuation, and Sentiment. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.
Which has better revenue growth: GS or RF?
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) (GS) scores higher on Growth (9.6/10 vs 8.3/10). Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) reports revenue growth (14.5% YoY) while Regions Financial Corporation reports (7.3% YoY). Growth scores reflect revenue and earnings momentum relative to sector peers.
Is GS or RF more attractively valued?
Regions Financial Corporation (RF) scores higher on Valuation (7.3/10 vs 4.8/10). GS trades at 16.7× P/E versus RF at 10.0×. Valuation is assessed using P/E ratio, analyst price targets, and 52-week range positioning relative to sector peers.
What do analysts say about GS vs RF?
There are 20 analysts covering GS with a consensus price target of $951.30, and 20 analysts covering RF with a consensus target of $30.75. Analyst consensus ratings are aggregated from Wall Street research and do not constitute investment advice.
Which is more profitable: GS or RF?
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) (GS) scores higher on Quality (7.4/10 vs 7.4/10). Net profit margin: GS at 29.4%, RF at 31.0%. Quality scores reflect profit margins, return on equity, and free cash flow generation.
Which has stronger financial health: GS or RF?
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) (GS) scores higher on Financial Health (6/10 vs 5.5/10). Market beta: GS at 1.29, RF at 1.03. Health scores consider beta, debt-to-equity, and current ratio. All investments carry risk — this is not investment advice.
What are the market caps of GS and RF?
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) (GS) has a market capitalisation of $323.5B, while Regions Financial Corporation (RF) has a market cap of $24.4B. Market cap data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and reflects the most recent available figures.
Do GS or RF pay dividends?
GS pays a dividend yield of 1.65%, while RF does not currently pay a dividend. Dividend yields fluctuate with share price and company payout decisions.
Related Comparisons
Q·Score is an educational tool and is not financial advice. Data provided by Yahoo Finance. Updated on each page load. How it's calculated →