Lam Research Corporation vs Microsoft Corporation — Stock Comparison
Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) are both listed on US exchanges. This page compares their Q·Score ratings, key fundamentals (P/E, margins, growth), and Wall Street analyst consensus side by side. Data sourced from Yahoo Finance and updated on each page load.
Lam Research Corporation narrowly edges Microsoft Corporation on Q·Score (8.8 vs 8.6 out of 10), led by Health (9.4 vs 8.5) and Growth (9.5 vs 8.8). Microsoft Corporation scores higher on Sentiment, reflecting stronger analyst and market sentiment. Analyst consensus targets imply greater upside for LRCX (+23.0%) than for MSFT (+16.7%).
Price Performance
Normalised to 100 at period start — shows relative performance.
Q·Score Breakdown
Earnings growing 35% year-over-year on 30% revenue growth.
95% of 55 covering analysts have a positive rating.
Analyst Consensus
Fundamentals
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCX vs MSFT: which stock scores better overall?
Based on Q·Score, Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) scores 8.8/10 versus Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 8.6/10. The Q·Score measures five dimensions: Quality, Health, Growth, Valuation, and Sentiment. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.
Which has better revenue growth: LRCX or MSFT?
Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) scores higher on Growth (9.5/10 vs 8.8/10). Lam Research Corporation reports revenue growth (30.0% YoY) while Microsoft Corporation reports (17.7% YoY). Growth scores reflect revenue and earnings momentum relative to sector peers.
Is LRCX or MSFT more attractively valued?
Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) scores higher on Valuation (7.8/10 vs 7.8/10). LRCX trades at 26.1× P/E versus MSFT at 20.7×. Valuation is assessed using P/E ratio, analyst price targets, and 52-week range positioning relative to sector peers.
What do analysts say about LRCX vs MSFT?
There are 31 analysts covering LRCX with a consensus price target of $371.35, and 52 analysts covering MSFT with a consensus target of $569.45. Analyst consensus ratings are aggregated from Wall Street research and do not constitute investment advice.
Which is more profitable: LRCX or MSFT?
Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) scores higher on Quality (9/10 vs 9/10). Net profit margin: LRCX at 31.3%, MSFT at 40.3%. Quality scores reflect profit margins, return on equity, and free cash flow generation.
Which has stronger financial health: LRCX or MSFT?
Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) scores higher on Financial Health (9.4/10 vs 8.5/10). Market beta: LRCX at 1.86, MSFT at 1.10. Health scores consider beta, debt-to-equity, and current ratio. All investments carry risk — this is not investment advice.
What are the market caps of LRCX and MSFT?
Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a market capitalisation of $377.9B, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a market cap of $3.62T. Market cap data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and reflects the most recent available figures.
Do LRCX or MSFT pay dividends?
LRCX pays a dividend yield of 0.33%, while MSFT pays a dividend yield of 0.75%. Dividend yields fluctuate with share price and company payout decisions.
Related Comparisons
Q·Score is an educational tool and is not financial advice. Data provided by Yahoo Finance. Updated on each page load. How it's calculated →