Quantify

MetLife, Inc. vs Wells Fargo & Company — Stock Comparison

MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) are both listed on US exchanges. This page compares their Q·Score ratings, key fundamentals (P/E, margins, growth), and Wall Street analyst consensus side by side. Data sourced from Yahoo Finance and updated on each page load.

vs
Q·Score Winner
Wells Fargo & Company
WFC7/10vs 6.6/10

Wells Fargo & Company narrowly edges MetLife, Inc. on Q·Score (7 vs 6.6 out of 10), led by Valuation (7.5 vs 6.5) and Quality (7.4 vs 6.6). Analyst consensus targets imply greater upside for WFC (+14.8%) than for MET (+3.6%).

Price Performance

Normalised to 100 at period start — shows relative performance.

Loading…
● MET● WFC

Q·Score Breakdown

6.6
Neutral
Overall
7
Bullish
6.6
Quality
7.4
5.5
Health
5.5
7.4
Growth
7.5
6.5
Valuation
7.5
6.8
Sentiment
7.2
MET

Earnings growing 36% year-over-year.

WFC

Earnings growing 15% year-over-year.

Analyst Consensus

Bullish
+3.6%
Target $92.00
16 analysts
Bullish
+14.8%
Target $96.11
22 analysts

Fundamentals

MET
WFC
17.2×
Trailing P/E
12.9×
8.1×
Forward P/E
10.6×
4.67%
Profit Margin
26.74%
23.75%
Gross Margin
0.00%
13.01%
ROE
12.03%
2.70%
Revenue Growth
5.70%
35.90%
Earnings Growth
15.10%
0.78
Beta
0.93
2.67%
Dividend Yield
2.15%
$57.2B
Market Cap
$256.2B
52-Week Range
MET
$6797% of range$89
WFC
$7245% of range$98

Frequently Asked Questions

MET vs WFC: which stock scores better overall?

Based on Q·Score, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) scores 7/10 versus MetLife, Inc. (MET) at 6.6/10. The Q·Score measures five dimensions: Quality, Health, Growth, Valuation, and Sentiment. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.

Which has better revenue growth: MET or WFC?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) scores higher on Growth (7.5/10 vs 7.4/10). MetLife, Inc. reports revenue growth (2.7% YoY) while Wells Fargo & Company reports (5.7% YoY). Growth scores reflect revenue and earnings momentum relative to sector peers.

Is MET or WFC more attractively valued?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) scores higher on Valuation (7.5/10 vs 6.5/10). MET trades at 8.1× P/E versus WFC at 10.6×. Valuation is assessed using P/E ratio, analyst price targets, and 52-week range positioning relative to sector peers.

What do analysts say about MET vs WFC?

There are 16 analysts covering MET with a consensus price target of $92.00, and 22 analysts covering WFC with a consensus target of $96.11. Analyst consensus ratings are aggregated from Wall Street research and do not constitute investment advice.

Which is more profitable: MET or WFC?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) scores higher on Quality (7.4/10 vs 6.6/10). Net profit margin: MET at 4.7%, WFC at 26.7%. Quality scores reflect profit margins, return on equity, and free cash flow generation.

Which has stronger financial health: MET or WFC?

MetLife, Inc. (MET) scores higher on Financial Health (5.5/10 vs 5.5/10). Market beta: MET at 0.78, WFC at 0.93. Health scores consider beta, debt-to-equity, and current ratio. All investments carry risk — this is not investment advice.

What are the market caps of MET and WFC?

MetLife, Inc. (MET) has a market capitalisation of $57.2B, while Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has a market cap of $256.2B. Market cap data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and reflects the most recent available figures.

Do MET or WFC pay dividends?

MET pays a dividend yield of 2.67%, while WFC pays a dividend yield of 2.15%. Dividend yields fluctuate with share price and company payout decisions.

Related Comparisons

BAC vs WFCJPM vs WFCMET vs PRUC vs WFC

Q·Score is an educational tool and is not financial advice. Data provided by Yahoo Finance. Updated on each page load. How it's calculated →

Data provided by Yahoo Finance ·  Updated on each page load ·  For informational purposes only · Not financial advice · Quantify.biz © 2026