Phillips 66 vs ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation — Stock Comparison
Phillips 66 (PSX) and ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation (XOM) are both listed on US exchanges. This page compares their Q·Score ratings, key fundamentals (P/E, margins, growth), and Wall Street analyst consensus side by side. Data sourced from Yahoo Finance and updated on each page load.
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation narrowly edges Phillips 66 on Q·Score (7.5 vs 7.3 out of 10), led by Health (8.5 vs 7) and Valuation (5.8 vs 5.5). Phillips 66 scores higher on Sentiment, reflecting stronger analyst and market sentiment. Analyst consensus targets imply greater upside for XOM (+3.0%) than for PSX (-7.5%).
Price Performance
Normalised to 100 at period start — shows relative performance.
Q·Score Breakdown
Earnings growing 345% year-over-year on 53% revenue growth.
Earnings growing 113% year-over-year on 44% revenue growth.
Analyst Consensus
Fundamentals
Frequently Asked Questions
PSX vs XOM: which stock scores better overall?
Based on Q·Score, ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation (XOM) scores 7.5/10 versus Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.3/10. The Q·Score measures five dimensions: Quality, Health, Growth, Valuation, and Sentiment. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.
Which has better revenue growth: PSX or XOM?
Phillips 66 (PSX) scores higher on Growth (10/10 vs 9.6/10). Phillips 66 reports revenue growth (53.1% YoY) while ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation reports (44.1% YoY). Growth scores reflect revenue and earnings momentum relative to sector peers.
Is PSX or XOM more attractively valued?
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation (XOM) scores higher on Valuation (5.8/10 vs 5.5/10). PSX trades at 11.9× P/E versus XOM at 15.4×. Valuation is assessed using P/E ratio, analyst price targets, and 52-week range positioning relative to sector peers.
What do analysts say about PSX vs XOM?
There are 19 analysts covering PSX with a consensus price target of $240.05, and 22 analysts covering XOM with a consensus target of $170.91. Analyst consensus ratings are aggregated from Wall Street research and do not constitute investment advice.
Which is more profitable: PSX or XOM?
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation (XOM) scores higher on Quality (7.7/10 vs 7.5/10). Net profit margin: PSX at 4.7%, XOM at 9.1%. Quality scores reflect profit margins, return on equity, and free cash flow generation.
Which has stronger financial health: PSX or XOM?
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation (XOM) scores higher on Financial Health (8.5/10 vs 7/10). Market beta: PSX at 0.70, XOM at 0.17. Health scores consider beta, debt-to-equity, and current ratio. All investments carry risk — this is not investment advice.
What are the market caps of PSX and XOM?
Phillips 66 (PSX) has a market capitalisation of $104.0B, while ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation (XOM) has a market cap of $682.5B. Market cap data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and reflects the most recent available figures.
Do PSX or XOM pay dividends?
PSX pays a dividend yield of 1.96%, while XOM pays a dividend yield of 2.48%. Dividend yields fluctuate with share price and company payout decisions.
Related Comparisons
Q·Score is an educational tool and is not financial advice. Data provided by Yahoo Finance. Updated on each page load. How it's calculated →