Regions Financial Corporation vs Wells Fargo & Company — Stock Comparison
Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) are both listed on US exchanges. This page compares their Q·Score ratings, key fundamentals (P/E, margins, growth), and Wall Street analyst consensus side by side. Data sourced from Yahoo Finance and updated on each page load.
Wells Fargo & Company narrowly edges Regions Financial Corporation on Q·Score (7.1 vs 6.4 out of 10), led by Sentiment (6.8 vs 4.3) and Growth (8.3 vs 6.6). Analyst price targets imply similar upside for both: +11.2% for RF and +12.2% for WFC.
Price Performance
Normalised to 100 at period start — shows relative performance.
Q·Score Breakdown
Strong profitability with 31% net profit margins.
⚠ cautious analyst consensus — few Buy ratings.
Earnings growing 25% year-over-year on 10% revenue growth.
Analyst Consensus
Fundamentals
Frequently Asked Questions
RF vs WFC: which stock scores better overall?
Based on Q·Score, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) scores 7.1/10 versus Regions Financial Corporation (RF) at 6.4/10. The Q·Score measures five dimensions: Quality, Health, Growth, Valuation, and Sentiment. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.
Which has better revenue growth: RF or WFC?
Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) scores higher on Growth (8.3/10 vs 6.6/10). Regions Financial Corporation reports revenue growth (3.4% YoY) while Wells Fargo & Company reports (9.5% YoY). Growth scores reflect revenue and earnings momentum relative to sector peers.
Is RF or WFC more attractively valued?
Regions Financial Corporation (RF) scores higher on Valuation (7.3/10 vs 7.3/10). RF trades at 10.4× P/E versus WFC at 11.4×. Valuation is assessed using P/E ratio, analyst price targets, and 52-week range positioning relative to sector peers.
What do analysts say about RF vs WFC?
There are 20 analysts covering RF with a consensus price target of $32.99, and 23 analysts covering WFC with a consensus target of $100.63. Analyst consensus ratings are aggregated from Wall Street research and do not constitute investment advice.
Which is more profitable: RF or WFC?
Regions Financial Corporation (RF) scores higher on Quality (7.4/10 vs 7.4/10). Net profit margin: RF at 30.8%, WFC at 27.2%. Quality scores reflect profit margins, return on equity, and free cash flow generation.
Which has stronger financial health: RF or WFC?
Regions Financial Corporation (RF) scores higher on Financial Health (5.5/10 vs 5.5/10). Market beta: RF at 1.00, WFC at 0.92. Health scores consider beta, debt-to-equity, and current ratio. All investments carry risk — this is not investment advice.
What are the market caps of RF and WFC?
Regions Financial Corporation (RF) has a market capitalisation of $25.3B, while Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has a market cap of $271.3B. Market cap data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and reflects the most recent available figures.
Do RF or WFC pay dividends?
RF pays a dividend yield of 3.65%, while WFC pays a dividend yield of 2.25%. Dividend yields fluctuate with share price and company payout decisions.
Related Comparisons
Q·Score is an educational tool and is not financial advice. Data provided by Yahoo Finance. Updated on each page load. How it's calculated →