Western Alliance Bancorporation vs Wells Fargo & Company — Stock Comparison
Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) are both listed on US exchanges. This page compares their Q·Score ratings, key fundamentals (P/E, margins, growth), and Wall Street analyst consensus side by side. Data sourced from Yahoo Finance and updated on each page load.
Wells Fargo & Company narrowly edges Western Alliance Bancorporation on Q·Score (7.1 vs 7 out of 10), led by Growth (8.3 vs 7.6) and Health (5.5 vs 5). Western Alliance Bancorporation scores higher on Sentiment, reflecting stronger analyst and market sentiment. Analyst consensus targets imply greater upside for WAL (+17.8%) than for WFC (+12.2%).
Price Performance
Normalised to 100 at period start — shows relative performance.
Q·Score Breakdown
Revenue expanding at 14% year-over-year.
⚠ balance sheet warrants attention.
Earnings growing 25% year-over-year on 10% revenue growth.
Analyst Consensus
Fundamentals
Frequently Asked Questions
WAL vs WFC: which stock scores better overall?
Based on Q·Score, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) scores 7.1/10 versus Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) at 7/10. The Q·Score measures five dimensions: Quality, Health, Growth, Valuation, and Sentiment. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.
Which has better revenue growth: WAL or WFC?
Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) scores higher on Growth (8.3/10 vs 7.6/10). Western Alliance Bancorporation reports revenue growth (13.6% YoY) while Wells Fargo & Company reports (9.5% YoY). Growth scores reflect revenue and earnings momentum relative to sector peers.
Is WAL or WFC more attractively valued?
Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) scores higher on Valuation (7.5/10 vs 7.3/10). WAL trades at 7.0× P/E versus WFC at 11.4×. Valuation is assessed using P/E ratio, analyst price targets, and 52-week range positioning relative to sector peers.
What do analysts say about WAL vs WFC?
There are 15 analysts covering WAL with a consensus price target of $93.07, and 23 analysts covering WFC with a consensus target of $100.63. Analyst consensus ratings are aggregated from Wall Street research and do not constitute investment advice.
Which is more profitable: WAL or WFC?
Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) scores higher on Quality (7.4/10 vs 7.4/10). Net profit margin: WAL at 28.2%, WFC at 27.2%. Quality scores reflect profit margins, return on equity, and free cash flow generation.
Which has stronger financial health: WAL or WFC?
Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) scores higher on Financial Health (5.5/10 vs 5/10). Market beta: WAL at 1.32, WFC at 0.92. Health scores consider beta, debt-to-equity, and current ratio. All investments carry risk — this is not investment advice.
What are the market caps of WAL and WFC?
Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) has a market capitalisation of $8.6B, while Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has a market cap of $271.3B. Market cap data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and reflects the most recent available figures.
Do WAL or WFC pay dividends?
WAL pays a dividend yield of 2.12%, while WFC pays a dividend yield of 2.25%. Dividend yields fluctuate with share price and company payout decisions.
Related Comparisons
Q·Score is an educational tool and is not financial advice. Data provided by Yahoo Finance. Updated on each page load. How it's calculated →