Quantify

ConocoPhillips vs Energy Transfer LP — Stock Comparison

ConocoPhillips (COP) and Energy Transfer LP (ET) are both listed on US exchanges. This page compares their Q·Score ratings, key fundamentals (P/E, margins, growth), and Wall Street analyst consensus side by side. Data sourced from Yahoo Finance and updated on each page load.

vs
Q·Score Winner
ConocoPhillips
COP7.7/10vs 7.2/10

ConocoPhillips narrowly edges Energy Transfer LP on Q·Score (7.7 vs 7.2 out of 10), led by Health (8.6 vs 5.5) and Quality (7.7 vs 6.7). Energy Transfer LP scores higher on Valuation, reflecting stronger P/E and price-target positioning. Analyst consensus targets imply greater upside for ET (+15.2%) than for COP (+3.4%).

Price Performance

Normalised to 100 at period start — shows relative performance.

Loading…
● COP● ET

Q·Score Breakdown

7.7
Bullish
Overall
7.2
Bullish
7.7
Quality
6.7
8.6
Health
5.5
9.1
Growth
8.1
5.8
Valuation
7.5
7.3
Sentiment
8.6
COP

Earnings growing 107% year-over-year on 36% revenue growth.

ET

90% of 21 covering analysts have a positive rating.

Analyst Consensus

Bullish
+3.4%
Target $146.08
25 analysts
Bullish
+15.2%
Target $24.58
21 analysts

Fundamentals

COP
ET
18.1×
Trailing P/E
14.7×
14.6×
Forward P/E
12.2×
14.40%
Profit Margin
4.92%
47.57%
Gross Margin
17.51%
14.18%
ROE
14.56%
35.50%
Revenue Growth
78.40%
107.00%
Earnings Growth
85.30%
0.13
Beta
0.57
2.46%
Dividend Yield
6.33%
$169.7B
Market Cap
$73.4B
52-Week Range
COP
$8699% of range$142
ET
$1691% of range$22

Frequently Asked Questions

COP vs ET: which stock scores better overall?

Based on Q·Score, ConocoPhillips (COP) scores 7.7/10 versus Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 7.2/10. The Q·Score measures five dimensions: Quality, Health, Growth, Valuation, and Sentiment. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.

Which has better revenue growth: COP or ET?

ConocoPhillips (COP) scores higher on Growth (9.1/10 vs 8.1/10). ConocoPhillips reports revenue growth (35.5% YoY) while Energy Transfer LP reports (78.4% YoY). Growth scores reflect revenue and earnings momentum relative to sector peers.

Is COP or ET more attractively valued?

Energy Transfer LP (ET) scores higher on Valuation (7.5/10 vs 5.8/10). COP trades at 14.6× P/E versus ET at 12.2×. Valuation is assessed using P/E ratio, analyst price targets, and 52-week range positioning relative to sector peers.

What do analysts say about COP vs ET?

There are 25 analysts covering COP with a consensus price target of $146.08, and 21 analysts covering ET with a consensus target of $24.58. Analyst consensus ratings are aggregated from Wall Street research and do not constitute investment advice.

Which is more profitable: COP or ET?

ConocoPhillips (COP) scores higher on Quality (7.7/10 vs 6.7/10). Net profit margin: COP at 14.4%, ET at 4.9%. Quality scores reflect profit margins, return on equity, and free cash flow generation.

Which has stronger financial health: COP or ET?

ConocoPhillips (COP) scores higher on Financial Health (8.6/10 vs 5.5/10). Market beta: COP at 0.13, ET at 0.57. Health scores consider beta, debt-to-equity, and current ratio. All investments carry risk — this is not investment advice.

What are the market caps of COP and ET?

ConocoPhillips (COP) has a market capitalisation of $169.7B, while Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a market cap of $73.4B. Market cap data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and reflects the most recent available figures.

Do COP or ET pay dividends?

COP pays a dividend yield of 2.46%, while ET pays a dividend yield of 6.33%. Dividend yields fluctuate with share price and company payout decisions.

Related Comparisons

COP vs XOMCOP vs CVXCOP vs DVNCOP vs EOGCOP vs LNG

Q·Score is an educational tool and is not financial advice. Data provided by Yahoo Finance. Updated on each page load. How it's calculated →

Data provided by Yahoo Finance ·  Updated on each page load ·  For informational purposes only · Not financial advice · Quantify.biz © 2026