Applied Materials, Inc. vs Microsoft Corporation — Stock Comparison
Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) are both listed on US exchanges. This page compares their Q·Score ratings, key fundamentals (P/E, margins, growth), and Wall Street analyst consensus side by side. Data sourced from Yahoo Finance and updated on each page load.
Microsoft Corporation narrowly edges Applied Materials, Inc. on Q·Score (8.6 vs 7.9 out of 10), led by Valuation (8.6 vs 4.8) and Sentiment (9 vs 8.1). Applied Materials, Inc. scores higher on Health, reflecting stronger balance sheet strength. Analyst consensus targets imply greater upside for MSFT (+43.7%) than for AMAT (-8.8%).
Price Performance
Normalised to 100 at period start — shows relative performance.
Q·Score Breakdown
Clean balance sheet with low leverage (0.3× debt-to-equity).
⚠ valuation metrics above sector average.
High-quality business with 34% return on equity and 39% profit margins.
Analyst Consensus
Fundamentals
Frequently Asked Questions
AMAT vs MSFT: which stock scores better overall?
Based on Q·Score, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) scores 8.6/10 versus Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) at 7.9/10. The Q·Score measures five dimensions: Quality, Health, Growth, Valuation, and Sentiment. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.
Which has better revenue growth: AMAT or MSFT?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) scores higher on Growth (8/10 vs 7.9/10). Applied Materials, Inc. reports revenue growth (11.4% YoY) while Microsoft Corporation reports (18.3% YoY). Growth scores reflect revenue and earnings momentum relative to sector peers.
Is AMAT or MSFT more attractively valued?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) scores higher on Valuation (8.6/10 vs 4.8/10). AMAT trades at 34.9× P/E versus MSFT at 20.2×. Valuation is assessed using P/E ratio, analyst price targets, and 52-week range positioning relative to sector peers.
What do analysts say about AMAT vs MSFT?
There are 36 analysts covering AMAT with a consensus price target of $517.28, and 55 analysts covering MSFT with a consensus target of $561.39. Analyst consensus ratings are aggregated from Wall Street research and do not constitute investment advice.
Which is more profitable: AMAT or MSFT?
Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) scores higher on Quality (9/10 vs 9/10). Net profit margin: AMAT at 29.3%, MSFT at 39.3%. Quality scores reflect profit margins, return on equity, and free cash flow generation.
Which has stronger financial health: AMAT or MSFT?
Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) scores higher on Financial Health (9.4/10 vs 8.5/10). Market beta: AMAT at 1.67, MSFT at 1.10. Health scores consider beta, debt-to-equity, and current ratio. All investments carry risk — this is not investment advice.
What are the market caps of AMAT and MSFT?
Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a market capitalisation of $450.4B, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a market cap of $2.90T. Market cap data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and reflects the most recent available figures.
Do AMAT or MSFT pay dividends?
AMAT pays a dividend yield of 0.37%, while MSFT pays a dividend yield of 0.93%. Dividend yields fluctuate with share price and company payout decisions.
Related Comparisons
Q·Score is an educational tool and is not financial advice. Data provided by Yahoo Finance. Updated on each page load. How it's calculated →