Lam Research Corporation vs NVIDIA Corporation — Stock Comparison

Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) are both listed on US exchanges. This page compares their Q·Score ratings, key fundamentals (P/E, margins, growth), and Wall Street analyst consensus side by side. Data sourced from Yahoo Finance and updated on each page load.

Q·Score Winner
NVIDIA Corporation
NVDA9.2/10vs 8/10

NVIDIA Corporation scores ahead of Lam Research Corporation on Q·Score (9.2 vs 8 out of 10), led by Valuation (8.8 vs 3.9) and Sentiment (8.9 vs 8.1). Lam Research Corporation scores higher on Growth, reflecting stronger revenue and earnings momentum. Analyst consensus targets imply greater upside for NVDA (+45.7%) than for LRCX (-11.8%).

Price Performance

Normalised to 100 at period start — shows relative performance.

Loading…
LRCXNVDA

Q·Score Breakdown

8
Bullish
Overall
9.2
Very Bullish
9
Quality
9
9.4
Health
9.7
9.6
Growth
9.5
3.9
Valuation
8.8
8.1
Sentiment
8.9
LRCX

Earnings growing 41% year-over-year on 24% revenue growth.

consensus analyst target is below current price.

NVDA

Clean balance sheet with low leverage (0.1× debt-to-equity).

Analyst Consensus

Bullish
-11.8%
Target $323.38
32 analysts
Bullish
+45.7%
Target $298.93
59 analysts

Fundamentals

LRCX
NVDA
69.5×
Trailing P/E
31.4×
46.0×
Forward P/E
16.1×
30.94%
Profit Margin
62.97%
49.98%
Gross Margin
74.14%
66.76%
ROE
114.29%
23.80%
Revenue Growth
85.20%
40.80%
Earnings Growth
214.50%
1.87
Beta
2.20
0.28%
Dividend Yield
0.49%
$458.7B
Market Cap
$4.97T
52-Week Range
LRCX
$8898% of range$374
NVDA
$14267% of range$237

Frequently Asked Questions

LRCX vs NVDA: which stock scores better overall?

Based on Q·Score, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) scores 9.2/10 versus Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) at 8/10. The Q·Score measures five dimensions: Quality, Health, Growth, Valuation, and Sentiment. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.

Which has better revenue growth: LRCX or NVDA?

Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) scores higher on Growth (9.6/10 vs 9.5/10). Lam Research Corporation reports revenue growth (23.8% YoY) while NVIDIA Corporation reports (85.2% YoY). Growth scores reflect revenue and earnings momentum relative to sector peers.

Is LRCX or NVDA more attractively valued?

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) scores higher on Valuation (8.8/10 vs 3.9/10). LRCX trades at 46.0× P/E versus NVDA at 16.1×. Valuation is assessed using P/E ratio, analyst price targets, and 52-week range positioning relative to sector peers.

What do analysts say about LRCX vs NVDA?

There are 32 analysts covering LRCX with a consensus price target of $323.38, and 59 analysts covering NVDA with a consensus target of $298.93. Analyst consensus ratings are aggregated from Wall Street research and do not constitute investment advice.

Which is more profitable: LRCX or NVDA?

Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) scores higher on Quality (9/10 vs 9/10). Net profit margin: LRCX at 30.9%, NVDA at 63.0%. Quality scores reflect profit margins, return on equity, and free cash flow generation.

Which has stronger financial health: LRCX or NVDA?

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) scores higher on Financial Health (9.7/10 vs 9.4/10). Market beta: LRCX at 1.87, NVDA at 2.20. Health scores consider beta, debt-to-equity, and current ratio. All investments carry risk — this is not investment advice.

What are the market caps of LRCX and NVDA?

Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a market capitalisation of $458.7B, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a market cap of $4.97T. Market cap data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and reflects the most recent available figures.

Do LRCX or NVDA pay dividends?

LRCX pays a dividend yield of 0.28%, while NVDA pays a dividend yield of 0.49%. Dividend yields fluctuate with share price and company payout decisions.

Q·Score is an educational tool and is not financial advice. Data provided by Yahoo Finance. Updated on each page load. How it's calculated →

Data provided by Yahoo Finance ·  Updated on each page load ·  For informational purposes only · Not financial advice · Quantify.biz © 2026