McCormick & Company, Incorporat vs Procter & Gamble Company (The) — Stock Comparison

McCormick & Company, Incorporat (MKC) and Procter & Gamble Company (The) (PG) are both listed on US exchanges. This page compares their Q·Score ratings, key fundamentals (P/E, margins, growth), and Wall Street analyst consensus side by side. Data sourced from Yahoo Finance and updated on each page load.

Q·Score Winner
McCormick & Company, Incorporat
MKC8/10vs 7.5/10

McCormick & Company, Incorporat narrowly edges Procter & Gamble Company (The) on Q·Score (8 vs 7.5 out of 10), led by Growth (9 vs 7) and Valuation (8.1 vs 6.8). Procter & Gamble Company (The) scores higher on Health, reflecting stronger balance sheet strength. Analyst consensus targets imply greater upside for MKC (+31.7%) than for PG (+8.6%).

Price Performance

Normalised to 100 at period start — shows relative performance.

Loading…
MKCPG

Q·Score Breakdown

8
Bullish
Overall
7.5
Bullish
9.3
Quality
9.3
6.8
Health
7.3
9
Growth
7
8.1
Valuation
6.8
6.1
Sentiment
6.6
MKC

High-quality business with 25% return on equity and 23% profit margins.

PG

High-quality business with 31% return on equity and 19% profit margins.

Analyst Consensus

Neutral
+31.7%
Target $61.23
13 analysts
Bullish
+8.6%
Target $163.43
23 analysts

Fundamentals

MKC
PG
7.6×
Trailing P/E
22.0×
13.9×
Forward P/E
21.2×
23.12%
Profit Margin
19.16%
38.18%
Gross Margin
50.98%
25.35%
ROE
31.11%
16.70%
Revenue Growth
7.40%
528.30%
Earnings Growth
5.80%
0.64
Beta
0.39
4.07%
Dividend Yield
$12.5B
Market Cap
$350.6B
52-Week Range
MKC
$455% of range$78
PG
$13844% of range$167

Frequently Asked Questions

MKC vs PG: which stock scores better overall?

Based on Q·Score, McCormick & Company, Incorporat (MKC) scores 8/10 versus Procter & Gamble Company (The) (PG) at 7.5/10. The Q·Score measures five dimensions: Quality, Health, Growth, Valuation, and Sentiment. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.

Which has better revenue growth: MKC or PG?

McCormick & Company, Incorporat (MKC) scores higher on Growth (9/10 vs 7/10). McCormick & Company, Incorporat reports revenue growth (16.7% YoY) while Procter & Gamble Company (The) reports (7.4% YoY). Growth scores reflect revenue and earnings momentum relative to sector peers.

Is MKC or PG more attractively valued?

McCormick & Company, Incorporat (MKC) scores higher on Valuation (8.1/10 vs 6.8/10). MKC trades at 13.9× P/E versus PG at 21.2×. Valuation is assessed using P/E ratio, analyst price targets, and 52-week range positioning relative to sector peers.

What do analysts say about MKC vs PG?

There are 13 analysts covering MKC with a consensus price target of $61.23, and 23 analysts covering PG with a consensus target of $163.43. Analyst consensus ratings are aggregated from Wall Street research and do not constitute investment advice.

Which is more profitable: MKC or PG?

McCormick & Company, Incorporat (MKC) scores higher on Quality (9.3/10 vs 9.3/10). Net profit margin: MKC at 23.1%, PG at 19.2%. Quality scores reflect profit margins, return on equity, and free cash flow generation.

Which has stronger financial health: MKC or PG?

Procter & Gamble Company (The) (PG) scores higher on Financial Health (7.3/10 vs 6.8/10). Market beta: MKC at 0.64, PG at 0.39. Health scores consider beta, debt-to-equity, and current ratio. All investments carry risk — this is not investment advice.

What are the market caps of MKC and PG?

McCormick & Company, Incorporat (MKC) has a market capitalisation of $12.5B, while Procter & Gamble Company (The) (PG) has a market cap of $350.6B. Market cap data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and reflects the most recent available figures.

Do MKC or PG pay dividends?

MKC pays a dividend yield of 4.07%, while PG does not currently pay a dividend. Dividend yields fluctuate with share price and company payout decisions.

Related Comparisons

Q·Score is an educational tool and is not financial advice. Data provided by Yahoo Finance. Updated on each page load. How it's calculated →

Data provided by Yahoo Finance ·  Updated on each page load ·  For informational purposes only · Not financial advice · Quantify.biz © 2026