AFLAC Incorporated vs Wells Fargo & Company — Stock Comparison
AFLAC Incorporated (AFL) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) are both listed on US exchanges. This page compares their Q·Score ratings, key fundamentals (P/E, margins, growth), and Wall Street analyst consensus side by side. Data sourced from Yahoo Finance and updated on each page load.
Wells Fargo & Company narrowly edges AFLAC Incorporated on Q·Score (7.2 vs 7 out of 10), led by Sentiment (7.2 vs 3.9) and Valuation (8.2 vs 5.8). AFLAC Incorporated scores higher on Quality, reflecting stronger profitability and returns. Analyst consensus targets imply greater upside for WFC (+16.9%) than for AFL (-2.6%).
Price Performance
Normalised to 100 at period start — shows relative performance.
Q·Score Breakdown
High-quality business with 16% return on equity and 26% profit margins.
⚠ 21% of analysts rate it Sell or Strong Sell.
Forward P/E of 10.4× is low relative to sector peers.
Analyst Consensus
Fundamentals
Frequently Asked Questions
AFL vs WFC: which stock scores better overall?
Based on Q·Score, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) scores 7.2/10 versus AFLAC Incorporated (AFL) at 7/10. The Q·Score measures five dimensions: Quality, Health, Growth, Valuation, and Sentiment. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.
Which has better revenue growth: AFL or WFC?
AFLAC Incorporated (AFL) scores higher on Growth (8.7/10 vs 7.5/10). AFLAC Incorporated reports revenue growth (27.9% YoY) while Wells Fargo & Company reports (5.7% YoY). Growth scores reflect revenue and earnings momentum relative to sector peers.
Is AFL or WFC more attractively valued?
Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) scores higher on Valuation (8.2/10 vs 5.8/10). AFL trades at 15.2× P/E versus WFC at 10.4×. Valuation is assessed using P/E ratio, analyst price targets, and 52-week range positioning relative to sector peers.
What do analysts say about AFL vs WFC?
There are 14 analysts covering AFL with a consensus price target of $112.43, and 22 analysts covering WFC with a consensus target of $96.11. Analyst consensus ratings are aggregated from Wall Street research and do not constitute investment advice.
Which is more profitable: AFL or WFC?
AFLAC Incorporated (AFL) scores higher on Quality (10/10 vs 7.4/10). Net profit margin: AFL at 25.6%, WFC at 26.7%. Quality scores reflect profit margins, return on equity, and free cash flow generation.
Which has stronger financial health: AFL or WFC?
Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) scores higher on Financial Health (5.5/10 vs 5/10). Market beta: AFL at 0.61, WFC at 0.93. Health scores consider beta, debt-to-equity, and current ratio. All investments carry risk — this is not investment advice.
What are the market caps of AFL and WFC?
AFLAC Incorporated (AFL) has a market capitalisation of $58.8B, while Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has a market cap of $251.5B. Market cap data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and reflects the most recent available figures.
Do AFL or WFC pay dividends?
AFL pays a dividend yield of 2.08%, while WFC pays a dividend yield of 2.12%. Dividend yields fluctuate with share price and company payout decisions.
Related Comparisons
Q·Score is an educational tool and is not financial advice. Data provided by Yahoo Finance. Updated on each page load. How it's calculated →