Morgan Stanley vs Wells Fargo & Company — Stock Comparison
Morgan Stanley (MS) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) are both listed on US exchanges. This page compares their Q·Score ratings, key fundamentals (P/E, margins, growth), and Wall Street analyst consensus side by side. Data sourced from Yahoo Finance and updated on each page load.
Wells Fargo & Company narrowly edges Morgan Stanley on Q·Score (7.1 vs 6.5 out of 10), led by Quality (7.4 vs 5) and Sentiment (6.8 vs 5.6). Morgan Stanley scores higher on Growth, reflecting stronger revenue and earnings momentum. Analyst consensus targets imply greater upside for WFC (+15.0%) than for MS (+11.5%).
Price Performance
Normalised to 100 at period start — shows relative performance.
Q·Score Breakdown
Earnings growing 62% year-over-year on 28% revenue growth.
⚠ weak profitability metrics drag quality score.
Earnings growing 25% year-over-year on 10% revenue growth.
Analyst Consensus
Fundamentals
Frequently Asked Questions
MS vs WFC: which stock scores better overall?
Based on Q·Score, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) scores 7.1/10 versus Morgan Stanley (MS) at 6.5/10. The Q·Score measures five dimensions: Quality, Health, Growth, Valuation, and Sentiment. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.
Which has better revenue growth: MS or WFC?
Morgan Stanley (MS) scores higher on Growth (9.7/10 vs 8.3/10). Morgan Stanley reports revenue growth (28.0% YoY) while Wells Fargo & Company reports (9.5% YoY). Growth scores reflect revenue and earnings momentum relative to sector peers.
Is MS or WFC more attractively valued?
Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) scores higher on Valuation (7.5/10 vs 6.5/10). MS trades at 15.6× P/E versus WFC at 11.0×. Valuation is assessed using P/E ratio, analyst price targets, and 52-week range positioning relative to sector peers.
What do analysts say about MS vs WFC?
There are 21 analysts covering MS with a consensus price target of $236.38, and 23 analysts covering WFC with a consensus target of $99.93. Analyst consensus ratings are aggregated from Wall Street research and do not constitute investment advice.
Which is more profitable: MS or WFC?
Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) scores higher on Quality (7.4/10 vs 5/10). Net profit margin: MS at 25.9%, WFC at 27.2%. Quality scores reflect profit margins, return on equity, and free cash flow generation.
Which has stronger financial health: MS or WFC?
Morgan Stanley (MS) scores higher on Financial Health (6/10 vs 5.5/10). Market beta: MS at 1.22, WFC at 0.92. Health scores consider beta, debt-to-equity, and current ratio. All investments carry risk — this is not investment advice.
What are the market caps of MS and WFC?
Morgan Stanley (MS) has a market capitalisation of $333.2B, while Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has a market cap of $265.9B. Market cap data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and reflects the most recent available figures.
Do MS or WFC pay dividends?
MS pays a dividend yield of 2.14%, while WFC pays a dividend yield of 2.06%. Dividend yields fluctuate with share price and company payout decisions.
Related Comparisons
Q·Score is an educational tool and is not financial advice. Data provided by Yahoo Finance. Updated on each page load. How it's calculated →