Energy Transfer LP vs ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation — Stock Comparison
Energy Transfer LP (ET) and ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation (XOM) are both listed on US exchanges. This page compares their Q·Score ratings, key fundamentals (P/E, margins, growth), and Wall Street analyst consensus side by side. Data sourced from Yahoo Finance and updated on each page load.
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation narrowly edges Energy Transfer LP on Q·Score (7.5 vs 7.2 out of 10), led by Health (8.5 vs 5.5) and Growth (9.6 vs 8.1). Energy Transfer LP scores higher on Sentiment, reflecting stronger analyst and market sentiment. Analyst consensus targets imply greater upside for ET (+15.2%) than for XOM (+0.9%).
Price Performance
Normalised to 100 at period start — shows relative performance.
Q·Score Breakdown
90% of 21 covering analysts have a positive rating.
Earnings growing 113% year-over-year on 44% revenue growth.
Analyst Consensus
Fundamentals
Frequently Asked Questions
ET vs XOM: which stock scores better overall?
Based on Q·Score, ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation (XOM) scores 7.5/10 versus Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 7.2/10. The Q·Score measures five dimensions: Quality, Health, Growth, Valuation, and Sentiment. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.
Which has better revenue growth: ET or XOM?
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation (XOM) scores higher on Growth (9.6/10 vs 8.1/10). Energy Transfer LP reports revenue growth (78.4% YoY) while ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation reports (44.1% YoY). Growth scores reflect revenue and earnings momentum relative to sector peers.
Is ET or XOM more attractively valued?
Energy Transfer LP (ET) scores higher on Valuation (7.5/10 vs 5.8/10). ET trades at 12.2× P/E versus XOM at 15.7×. Valuation is assessed using P/E ratio, analyst price targets, and 52-week range positioning relative to sector peers.
What do analysts say about ET vs XOM?
There are 21 analysts covering ET with a consensus price target of $24.58, and 22 analysts covering XOM with a consensus target of $170.91. Analyst consensus ratings are aggregated from Wall Street research and do not constitute investment advice.
Which is more profitable: ET or XOM?
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation (XOM) scores higher on Quality (7.7/10 vs 6.7/10). Net profit margin: ET at 4.9%, XOM at 9.1%. Quality scores reflect profit margins, return on equity, and free cash flow generation.
Which has stronger financial health: ET or XOM?
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation (XOM) scores higher on Financial Health (8.5/10 vs 5.5/10). Market beta: ET at 0.57, XOM at 0.17. Health scores consider beta, debt-to-equity, and current ratio. All investments carry risk — this is not investment advice.
What are the market caps of ET and XOM?
Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a market capitalisation of $73.4B, while ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation (XOM) has a market cap of $696.2B. Market cap data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and reflects the most recent available figures.
Do ET or XOM pay dividends?
ET pays a dividend yield of 6.33%, while XOM pays a dividend yield of 2.50%. Dividend yields fluctuate with share price and company payout decisions.
Related Comparisons
Q·Score is an educational tool and is not financial advice. Data provided by Yahoo Finance. Updated on each page load. How it's calculated →