Amazon.com, Inc. vs Studio City International Holdi — Stock Comparison

Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) and Studio City International Holdi (MSC) are both listed on US exchanges. This page compares their Q·Score ratings, key fundamentals (P/E, margins, growth), and Wall Street analyst consensus side by side. Data sourced from Yahoo Finance and updated on each page load.

Q·Score Winner
Amazon.com, Inc.
AMZN8.4/10vs 4.1/10

Amazon.com, Inc. holds a significant lead over Studio City International Holdi on Q·Score (8.4 vs 4.1 out of 10), led by Quality (8.2 vs 3) and Health (8 vs 3.3). Analysts covering AMZN have a consensus price target implying +28.1% from current levels.

Price Performance

Normalised to 100 at period start — shows relative performance.

Loading…
AMZNMSC

Q·Score Breakdown

8.4
Bullish
Overall
4.1
Bearish
8.2
Quality
3
8
Health
3.3
9.5
Growth
6
7.3
Valuation
3.8
9
Sentiment
5
AMZN

Earnings growing 75% year-over-year on 17% revenue growth.

MSC

Positive growth trajectory.

currently unprofitable (-6% margin).

Analyst Consensus

Bullish
+28.1%
Target $312.99
63 analysts
N/A
0 analysts

Fundamentals

AMZN
MSC
31.7×
Trailing P/E
24.7×
Forward P/E
-19.2×
12.22%
Profit Margin
-5.63%
50.60%
Gross Margin
68.08%
24.29%
ROE
-7.46%
16.60%
Revenue Growth
9.30%
74.80%
Earnings Growth
1.44
Beta
0.09
$2.63T
Market Cap
$370M
52-Week Range
AMZN
$19659% of range$279
MSC
$21% of range$7

Frequently Asked Questions

AMZN vs MSC: which stock scores better overall?

Based on Q·Score, Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) scores 8.4/10 versus Studio City International Holdi (MSC) at 4.1/10. The Q·Score measures five dimensions: Quality, Health, Growth, Valuation, and Sentiment. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.

Which has better revenue growth: AMZN or MSC?

Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) scores higher on Growth (9.5/10 vs 6/10). Amazon.com, Inc. reports revenue growth (16.6% YoY) while Studio City International Holdi reports (9.3% YoY). Growth scores reflect revenue and earnings momentum relative to sector peers.

Is AMZN or MSC more attractively valued?

Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) scores higher on Valuation (7.3/10 vs 3.8/10). Valuation is assessed using P/E ratio, analyst price targets, and 52-week range positioning relative to sector peers.

What do analysts say about AMZN vs MSC?

There are 63 analysts covering AMZN with a consensus price target of $312.99, and MSC with a consensus target of N/A. Analyst consensus ratings are aggregated from Wall Street research and do not constitute investment advice.

Which is more profitable: AMZN or MSC?

Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) scores higher on Quality (8.2/10 vs 3/10). Net profit margin: AMZN at 12.2%, MSC at -5.6%. Quality scores reflect profit margins, return on equity, and free cash flow generation.

Which has stronger financial health: AMZN or MSC?

Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) scores higher on Financial Health (8/10 vs 3.3/10). Market beta: AMZN at 1.44, MSC at 0.09. Health scores consider beta, debt-to-equity, and current ratio. All investments carry risk — this is not investment advice.

What are the market caps of AMZN and MSC?

Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) has a market capitalisation of $2.63T, while Studio City International Holdi (MSC) has a market cap of $370M. Market cap data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and reflects the most recent available figures.

Q·Score is an educational tool and is not financial advice. Data provided by Yahoo Finance. Updated on each page load. How it's calculated →

Data provided by Yahoo Finance ·  Updated on each page load ·  For informational purposes only · Not financial advice · Quantify.biz © 2026