Mastercard Incorporated vs Wells Fargo & Company — Stock Comparison
Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) are both listed on US exchanges. This page compares their Q·Score ratings, key fundamentals (P/E, margins, growth), and Wall Street analyst consensus side by side. Data sourced from Yahoo Finance and updated on each page load.
Mastercard Incorporated scores ahead of Wells Fargo & Company on Q·Score (8.2 vs 7.2 out of 10), led by Growth (9.5 vs 7.5) and Quality (9.3 vs 7.4). Wells Fargo & Company scores higher on Valuation, reflecting stronger P/E and price-target positioning. Analyst consensus targets imply greater upside for MA (+31.8%) than for WFC (+15.2%).
Price Performance
Normalised to 100 at period start — shows relative performance.
Q·Score Breakdown
Earnings growing 21% year-over-year on 16% revenue growth.
Forward P/E of 10.6× is low relative to sector peers.
Analyst Consensus
Fundamentals
Frequently Asked Questions
MA vs WFC: which stock scores better overall?
Based on Q·Score, Mastercard Incorporated (MA) scores 8.2/10 versus Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) at 7.2/10. The Q·Score measures five dimensions: Quality, Health, Growth, Valuation, and Sentiment. For informational purposes only — not financial advice.
Which has better revenue growth: MA or WFC?
Mastercard Incorporated (MA) scores higher on Growth (9.5/10 vs 7.5/10). Mastercard Incorporated reports revenue growth (15.8% YoY) while Wells Fargo & Company reports (5.7% YoY). Growth scores reflect revenue and earnings momentum relative to sector peers.
Is MA or WFC more attractively valued?
Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) scores higher on Valuation (8.1/10 vs 7/10). MA trades at 21.6× P/E versus WFC at 10.6×. Valuation is assessed using P/E ratio, analyst price targets, and 52-week range positioning relative to sector peers.
What do analysts say about MA vs WFC?
There are 36 analysts covering MA with a consensus price target of $646.97, and 22 analysts covering WFC with a consensus target of $96.11. Analyst consensus ratings are aggregated from Wall Street research and do not constitute investment advice.
Which is more profitable: MA or WFC?
Mastercard Incorporated (MA) scores higher on Quality (9.3/10 vs 7.4/10). Net profit margin: MA at 45.9%, WFC at 26.7%. Quality scores reflect profit margins, return on equity, and free cash flow generation.
Which has stronger financial health: MA or WFC?
Mastercard Incorporated (MA) scores higher on Financial Health (6/10 vs 5.5/10). Market beta: MA at 0.74, WFC at 0.93. Health scores consider beta, debt-to-equity, and current ratio. All investments carry risk — this is not investment advice.
What are the market caps of MA and WFC?
Mastercard Incorporated (MA) has a market capitalisation of $433.9B, while Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has a market cap of $255.2B. Market cap data is sourced from Yahoo Finance and reflects the most recent available figures.
Do MA or WFC pay dividends?
MA pays a dividend yield of 0.72%, while WFC pays a dividend yield of 2.18%. Dividend yields fluctuate with share price and company payout decisions.
Related Comparisons
Q·Score is an educational tool and is not financial advice. Data provided by Yahoo Finance. Updated on each page load. How it's calculated →